DRC, Monaco, Bulgaria, and Côte d’Ivoire Removed from FATF Grey List Countries, 30th October 2026
The FATF concluded its October 2026 Plenary in Paris on 30 October 2026. The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Monaco, Bulgaria, and Côte d’Ivoire were removed from the grey list, bringing the list of jurisdictions under increased monitoring to 18. The FATF blacklist remained unchanged. This page sets out the full country lists and what UAE regulated entities need to update.
Key takeaways: FATF Plenary October 2026
- Added to the grey list: None
- Removed from the grey list: DRC, Monaco, Bulgaria, and Côte d’Ivoire
- Grey list now has 18 jurisdictions (22 before the October 2026 Plenary)
- Blacklist (call for action): No change
- First Plenary under UK President Giles Thomson (term 1 July 2026 to 30 June 2028)
- Additional risk signals: the FATF expressed concern about Vietnam’s pace of progress and warned that Myanmar could face countermeasures if progress remains insufficient by February 2027. Neither statement changes the October country counts.
- Next scheduled plenary and working-group meetings: 22–26 February 2027
Outcome of the FATF Plenary, October 2026
The FATF removed Bulgaria, Côte d’Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Monaco from its grey list on 30 October 2026. No countries were added. The number of jurisdictions under increased monitoring fell from 22 to 18. The FATF’s separate call-for-action list remains Iran, North Korea and Myanmar.
The FATF announced the changes at its Plenary in Paris from 28 to 30 October 2026. For UAE-regulated entities, the immediate task is to check whether the removals affect existing geographic risk ratings, customer due diligence, and internal country-risk controls. Removal from the grey list does not mean you must classify every related customer as low risk.
What changed on the FATF grey list in October 2026
The October 2026 Plenary removed four jurisdictions from the grey list: DRC, Monaco, Bulgaria, and Côte d’Ivoire. No jurisdictions were added.
Countries added to the FATF grey list on 30 October 2026
None
Countries removed from the FATF grey list on 30 October 2026
DRC, Monaco, Bulgaria, and Côte d’Ivoire completed their action plans within the agreed timeframe, and on-site visits confirmed the reforms are being implemented. They will continue to work with their FATF-style regional bodies to strengthen their AML/CFT/CPF regimes.
FATF grey list countries in full, as of 30 October 2026
The FATF grey list (officially, “Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring”) now contains 18 jurisdictions:
1. Angola
2. Bolivia
3. Bosnia and Herzegovina
4. Cameroon
5. Haiti
6. Iraq
7. Kenya
8. Kuwait
9. Lao People’s Democratic Republic
10. Lebanon
11. Nepal
12. Papua New Guinea
13. South Sudan
14. Syria
15. Venezuela
16. Vietnam
17. Virgin Islands (UK)
18. Yemen
FATF blacklist countries in full, as of 30 October 2026
The FATF blacklist (officially, “High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action”) lists jurisdictions with serious strategic deficiencies:
- Iran and DPRK: the FATF calls on members to apply countermeasures.
- Myanmar: the FATF calls for enhanced due diligence proportionate to the risk, without disrupting humanitarian aid or remittance flows.
What the grey list and blacklist mean for UAE firms
| Grey list | Blacklist |
Official name | Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring | High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action |
Status | Cooperating with the FATF on an action plan | Serious, unresolved strategic deficiencies |
UAE expectation | Apply proportionate EDD where Article 23 of Cabinet Resolution No. 134 of 2025 applies, together with any National Committee or supervisory requirements | Apply proportionate EDD for Myanmar and countermeasures for Iran and DPRK, together with any additional UAE National Committee or supervisory requirements |
goAML reporting | Submit STR/SAR where suspicion or reasonable grounds for suspicion exist; assess any additional HRC/HRCA duties under current UAE requirements. | Apply HRC/HRCA requirements for the relevant UAE-designated jurisdictions and in-scope transactions or activities, alongside STR/SAR duties where applicable |
Grey-listing is not a sanction, and FATF does not itself call for enhanced due diligence solely because a jurisdiction is grey-listed. UAE-regulated entities must still comply with Article 23 of Cabinet Resolution No. 134 of 2025, which requires proportionate enhanced customer due diligence for relevant relationships or transactions involving persons from countries identified by the National Committee as high-risk or from countries with AML/CFT/CPF deficiencies. Additional National Committee and supervisory measures also apply.
What else did the FATF decide at the October 2026 plenary?
The October plenary was about more than country listings. Under the UK Presidency of Giles Thomson, FATF advanced work on virtual assets, fraud and scam compounds, a more proportionate risk-based approach, and country assessments. These developments matter for UAE financial institutions, DNFBPs and VASPs, but none of the initiatives below should be described as a new UAE legal obligation merely because FATF announced it.
What is changing for virtual assets and VASPs?
FATF agreed to a targeted review and accelerated follow-up for jurisdictions with materially important virtual asset activity. The review will assess implementation gaps against FATF standards for virtual assets and virtual asset service providers. FATF expects to publish initial results in June 2027 and further results in October 2027. UAE VASPs and other regulated firms with virtual asset exposure should monitor developments and review their existing risk assessments, travel-rule controls, counterparty checks and relevant legal requirements. The plenary announcement itself does not impose a new universal deadline on individual UAE VASPs.
Why did fraud and scam compounds receive special attention?
FATF approved a report examining illicit financial flows linked to scam compounds and the criminal networks supporting them. As of 31 October 2026, FATF announced it would publish the report the following week; it should not yet be described as a published final report. The practical lesson is to examine networks, payment routes, intermediaries, and virtual asset exposure rather than looking only for individual suspicious transactions. Any alert decisions and reporting must still follow applicable UAE rules.
What changed in mutual evaluations and the risk-based approach?
FATF adopted new-round mutual evaluation reports for Mexico and the United States, with publication expected in December 2026 after quality and consistency review. These assessments will be accompanied by time-bound roadmaps for key recommended actions. FATF also agreed to more tailored assessments for certain low-capacity countries and further work on improving risk-based supervision and resource prioritisation. A FATF forum on these issues is scheduled for 1–2 December 2026. These are forward-looking initiatives, not revisions to the October grey list.
Other plenary context: Barbados, Namibia and Thailand participated under the Guest Initiative. FATF confirmed that Russia’s membership suspension remains in place. Source: FATF, Outcomes of the Plenary, 28–30 October 2026
Did every grey-listed jurisdiction provide an updated report in October?
No. FATF said Bosnia and Herzegovina, Haiti, Iraq, and Yemen did not submit progress updates for this cycle, so it carried forward their previously published statements. This does not, by itself, establish that their position improved or deteriorated. It means the public wording for those four jurisdictions may not reflect every development since the previous statement. Compliance teams should distinguish a carried-forward statement from a newly reviewed country update.
Why were the four countries removed?
FATF confirmed that each jurisdiction made sufficient progress in addressing its agreed action plan and that successful on-site visits supported the decision to end increased monitoring. The jurisdictions will continue working with their FATF-style regional bodies to sustain improvements.
Country-by-country reasons below are drawn from FATF’s 30 October 2026 jurisdiction statements. All four jurisdictions completed their agreed action plans and passed on-site visits. These were verified AML/CFT/CPF improvements, not declarations that financial crime risk had disappeared.
Why was Bulgaria removed from the FATF grey list?
Bulgaria was removed on 30 October 2026 after completing the FATF action plan it had agreed to following its October 2023 grey-listing. A successful on-site visit confirmed progress in implementing the reforms.
FATF recognised implementation of Bulgaria’s national AML/CFT strategy, risk-based supervision of postal money operators, currency exchange providers and real estate agents, and stronger market-entry controls for virtual asset service providers. Bulgaria also improved the accuracy of beneficial ownership information, automated prioritisation of suspicious transaction reports, money laundering investigations involving corruption and organised crime, asset confiscation, and terrorist- and proliferation-financing sanctions controls.
Why was Côte d’Ivoire (Ivory Coast) removed from the FATF grey list?
Côte d’Ivoire was removed on 30 October 2026 after completing the action plan agreed when it entered increased monitoring in October 2024. FATF confirmed successful on-site verification of its progress.
The country improved international cooperation in money laundering and terrorist financing cases, introduced stronger risk-based supervision of financial institutions and designated non-financial businesses and professions, and improved verification and access to beneficial ownership information. FATF also recognised more effective use of financial intelligence, a sustained increase in relevant investigations and prosecutions, and improvements to targeted financial sanctions.
Why was the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo) removed from the FATF grey list?
The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) left the grey list on 30 October 2026 after completing the action plan that followed its October 2022 listing and passing FATF’s on-site assessment.
The DRC finalised its national money laundering and terrorist financing risk assessment and adopted a national AML/CFT strategy. It designated supervisors across DNFBP sectors, developed a risk-based supervision plan, increased the resources and analytical capabilities of its financial intelligence unit, strengthened investigative and prosecutorial capacity, and demonstrated effective implementation of targeted financial sanctions relating to terrorist and proliferation financing.
Why was Monaco removed from the FATF grey list?
Monaco was removed on 30 October 2026 after completing its action plan following its June 2024 grey-listing. FATF’s successful on-site visit confirmed the progress of its AML/CFT reforms.
FATF recognised Monaco’s stronger understanding of money laundering risks linked to foreign tax fraud, increased requests to overseas authorities to identify and seize criminal assets, and tougher enforcement of AML/CFT and beneficial ownership requirements. Monaco also strengthened its financial intelligence unit, improved the quality and timeliness of suspicious transaction reporting, increased judicial and prosecution resources, and expanded the seizure of suspected criminal property.
How did FATF verify that the four countries were ready for removal?
FATF did not remove the countries simply because they passed new legislation. Its process first evaluates whether countries have completed all or nearly all action-plan commitments, then uses an on-site review to confirm that reforms are being implemented and that political commitment and institutional capacity exist to sustain them. FATF confirmed that successful on-site visits preceded the four October 2026 removals.
This distinction matters. An improved law is an important step, but effective AML supervision also depends on operational evidence: usable financial intelligence, investigations, sanctions implementation, beneficial ownership information and appropriate enforcement. The four countries completed different action plans, so their reforms should not be described as identical.
Source:
What can other countries learn from the four successful action plans?
A comparison of the FATF findings reveals five recurring features, although not every item was present in every country: risk-based supervision that reaches the relevant professions and firms; beneficial ownership information that authorities can access and verify; financial intelligence that is used, not just collected; financial-crime investigations and confiscation activity; and implementation of targeted financial sanctions.
For example, Bulgaria improved automated prioritisation of suspicious transaction reports and controls over certain regulated sectors. Côte d’Ivoire strengthened international cooperation, beneficial ownership verification and the use of FIU intelligence. The DRC designated DNFBP supervisors, adopted a risk-based supervisory plan and strengthened FIU capacity. Monaco improved outbound asset-recovery requests, STR reporting and the resources available to investigators and prosecutors. FATF recognised these improvements in its individual removal statements.
AML UAE interpretation: a practical reform programme needs an evidence trail linking legal changes to supervisory inspections, access to ownership records, FIU analysis, investigations and actual outcomes. This is an analytical lesson drawn from the FATF statements, not a new FATF requirement or a ranking of the four countries.
How long were Bulgaria, Côte d’Ivoire, the DRC and Monaco on the FATF grey list?
The countries entered increased monitoring in different plenary cycles and therefore followed different reform timetables. The durations below are approximate elapsed months between the relevant listing and removal announcements, not a FATF assessment of relative performance.
Jurisdiction | First monitored | Removed | Approx. period |
Bulgaria | October 2023 | 30 October 2026 | 36 months |
Côte d’Ivoire | October 2024 | 30 October 2026 | 24 months |
DR Congo | October 2022 | 30 October 2026 | 48 months |
Monaco | June 2024 | 30 October 2026 | 28 months |
A shorter period on the grey list does not necessarily mean a country implemented stronger controls or faced less serious weaknesses. Its starting deficiencies, action-plan commitments, institutional context and assessment timetable all differ.
What does delisting mean for customers, banks and businesses in these four countries?
Removal ends FATF-increased monitoring. It may support a reassessment of country-related risk and compliance processes, but it does not automatically remove existing customer due diligence, sanctions screening, or other obligations. Financial institutions should still consider the individual customer, transaction, sector, exposure, and applicable local rules.
Does removal make international transfers, banking or trade easier?
Removal ends FATF’s increased monitoring of the country and may prompt banks, correspondent institutions, trade counterparties, and compliance teams to review their country-risk settings. Whether a particular payment, account opening, or transaction becomes easier depends on the institution and the full relationship risk. FATF does not require banks to lower fees, approve transfers, or relax controls after delisting.
A person or business based in one of the four removed jurisdictions may still face source-of-funds questions, beneficial ownership checks, sanctions screening, adverse media reviews, or higher-risk treatment for unrelated reasons. The same applies to transactions involving another high-risk jurisdiction. Readers should therefore distinguish a country-level regulatory development from a decision about their own account or transfer.
What does FATF delisting not change?
- It does not remove any UN, UAE, or other applicable sanctions restrictions.
- It does not automatically reduce a customer, shareholder, supplier, or payment to low risk.
- It does not guarantee access to a bank account, correspondent banking service, investment product or international payment channel.
- It does not mean the country no longer has any money laundering or terrorist financing risks. The relevant regional body continues its follow-up work.
- It does not cancel a UAE-regulated entity’s risk-based CDD, EDD, transaction monitoring, or reporting duties.
What remains to be done after the four countries leave increased monitoring?
Bulgaria and Monaco will continue working with MONEYVAL; Côte d’Ivoire with GIABA; and the DRC with GABAC and ESAAMLG. FATF expressly called on the countries to sustain improvements. Delisting is therefore a milestone in the monitoring process, not the end of AML/CFT/CPF oversight.
For organisations monitoring these countries, useful developments to follow include subsequent mutual evaluation or follow-up reports, supervisory enforcement, beneficial ownership data quality, financial-intelligence outcomes and changes to national or international sanctions requirements. These indicators are more informative than repeatedly treating the original FATF status as the only country-risk factor.
What warning did FATF issue to Vietnam in October 2026?
Vietnam remains on the grey list. FATF expressed significant concern about the pace of progress on Vietnam’s action plan and said it would consider next steps if Vietnam does not make tangible improvements by the next plenary. That is a warning, not an announcement that Vietnam has been moved to the blacklist. Firms should monitor FATF’s subsequent decisions and assess Vietnam-linked exposures under their existing country-risk and supervisory requirements.
Did the FATF blacklist change in October 2026?
No. Iran and North Korea remain subject to the FATF’s call for countermeasures. Myanmar remains subject to a call for enhanced due diligence measures proportionate to the risks, rather than countermeasures. FATF reiterated concerns about Myanmar’s fraud and cyber-scam risks and warned it could face countermeasures if its progress is insufficient by February 2027.
UAE AML compliance: what regulated entities should do now
Under Federal Decree-Law No. 10 of 2025 and Cabinet Resolution No. 134 of 2025, financial institutions, DNFBPs and VASPs must keep their risk assessments current and apply measures proportionate to geographic risk. After this update:
- Update your Enterprise-Wide Risk Assessment (EWRA) so the geographic risk factor reflects the removal of DRC, Monaco, Bulgaria, and Côte d’Ivoire.
- Revise your high-risk country list in your AML/CFT policy and customer risk assessment methodology, and record the date of change.
- Re-rate affected customers. Identify customers, UBOs, counterparties and transactions linked to the delisted countries and refresh their risk rating, reviewing whether enhanced measures are still justified.
- Recalibrate screening and transaction monitoring rules, thresholds and country lists so alerts fire correctly from day one.
- Check goAML reporting triggers. Consult the current UAE FIU, National Committee and applicable supervisory requirements to determine whether HRC/HRCA reporting and any transaction-holding period apply. Submit STRs/SARs when suspicion or reasonable grounds for suspicion arise.
- Brief staff and senior management through targeted training and a documented board or MLRO update.
Does the FATF grey list affect UAE customer onboarding?
Yes, but not as a blanket ban. Firms should assess the customer’s geographic exposure and apply the EDD required by Article 23 of Cabinet Resolution No. 134 of 2025 and any relevant National Committee or supervisory requirements. FATF does not call for cutting off entire classes of customers solely because of grey-list status. For delisted countries, review the remaining legal requirements and customer-specific risks before changing enhanced measures; removal from the FATF list does not automatically remove them.
Does the October 2026 delisting change EDD for customers linked to the four countries?
FATF states that it does not call for EDD solely because a jurisdiction is grey-listed. For UAE regulated entities, Article 23 of Cabinet Resolution No. 134 of 2025 must also be considered. It requires enhanced customer due diligence proportionate to the risks arising from relevant relationships or transactions involving persons from specified high-risk countries or jurisdictions with AML/CFT/CPF deficiencies. Any additional National Committee or supervisory measures must be respected.
The compliance position therefore depends on the applicable UAE rules, the jurisdiction and the risk presented by the particular customer or transaction. A FATF removal does not cancel separate sanctions restrictions or other country risk indicators.
What should readers watch after the October 2026 plenary?
Monitor:
- The next FATF statement on Vietnam and Myanmar
- Any subsequent UAE National Committee or supervisory directions on high-risk jurisdictions
- Publication of the scam-compound report
- Publication of the targeted VASP review results in June and October 2027, and
- Publication of the Mexico and United States mutual evaluations expected in December 2026. These developments have different effective dates and should not be treated as changes to the current 18-country grey list.
FATF’s event calendar currently schedules the next plenary and working-group meetings for 22–26 February 2027. This is a meeting schedule, not an advance decision on which jurisdictions will be added or removed.
FAQs on the FATF grey list update, October 2026
Which countries were added to the FATF grey list in October 2026?
No countries were added to the FATF grey list at the Plenary that concluded on 30 October 2026.
Which countries were removed from the FATF grey list in October 2026?
DRC, Monaco, Bulgaria, and Côte d’Ivoire were removed after completing their FATF action plans and passing on-site visits.
How many countries are on the FATF grey list now?
As of 30 October 2026, 18 jurisdictions are under increased monitoring.
Does grey-listing mean sanctions or automatic enhanced due diligence?
Grey-listing is not a sanction, and FATF does not itself require EDD solely because of grey-list status. UAE firms must also apply Article 23 of Cabinet Resolution No. 134 of 2025 and any relevant National Committee or supervisory requirements. Where those rules require EDD, its extent must be proportionate to the risk.
When is the next FATF grey list update?
FATF’s next plenary and working-group meetings are scheduled for 22–26 February 2027. Check FATF’s official statements at the conclusion of the meetings for any changes to the lists.
Does delisting automatically remove enhanced checks for a customer?
No. A bank, DNFBP, or VASP should review the person’s circumstances and the applicable law. Delisting can change one geographic-risk input, but it does not cancel obligations arising from customer behaviour, ownership complexity, sanctions, higher-risk products or directions of the competent regulator.
Did Iran, North Korea or Myanmar leave the blacklist?
No. All three remain subject to a call for action; the applicable FATF responses differ by jurisdiction.
What should a UAE AML compliance officer do first after the October 2026 FATF update?
Check the firm’s actual exposure to the four delisted countries, review geographic-risk inputs, and document any resulting changes to customer ratings, policies, and controls before approving implementation.
Is Monaco on the FATF grey list?
No. FATF removed Monaco on 30 October 2026. It had been listed since June 2024.
Is Bulgaria on the FATF grey list?
No. FATF removed Bulgaria on 30 October 2026. It had been listed since October 2023.
Is Côte d’Ivoire on the FATF grey list?
No. FATF removed it on 30 October 2026. It had been listed since October 2024.
Is the Democratic Republic of the Congo on the FATF grey list?
No. FATF removed DRC on 30 October 2026. It had been listed since October 2022.
Is Vietnam still on the FATF grey list?
Yes. FATF said it will consider next steps if Vietnam does not make tangible improvements by the next plenary.
Need support updating your compliance framework for the October 2026 FATF changes?
We assess the impact of the grey list changes on your business and update your EWRA, policies, customer risk methodology and screening settings.
Share via :
Share via :















