Protect your business with reliable and effective AML strategies with AML UAE.
Last Reviewed On: 09/30/2026 | Last Updated On: 09/30/2026
Trade-based money laundering is one of the most common forms of money laundering. It is an easy way exploited by criminals to launder money between different countries, wherein they misrepresent the quality, value, or amount of goods traded through various channels.
Trade financing processes are misused to facilitate the flow of illicit funds. Trade is conducted across different jurisdictions subject to different regulations, making detecting suspicious transactions difficult. Also, the complexity of trade transactions and the volume of goods traded are the loopholes these launderers exploit to their advantage.
Let’s understand trade-based money laundering, related red flags, and how businesses can mitigate the risk arising from trade-based money laundering.
What is trade-based money laundering?
Trade-based money laundering (TBML) cleans dirty money through trade transactions and activities. The trade transactions are exploited to transfer and convert illicit money into legitimate cash or commodity disguising the movement of illicit funds as legitimate trade and thereby avoiding suspicion from regulatory authorities. Money laundering is defined and criminalised under Article 2 of Federal Decree-Law No. 10 of 2025, while the financing of terrorism and the financing of proliferation are criminalised under Article 3 of the same Decree-Law.
For example, importing and exporting goods is just a cover for the movement of illegal funds, making the trade transaction appear legal between two countries.
It is also a way to evade taxes. Companies show different amounts in invoices, thereby reporting reduced profits and taxes decrease. Alternatively, they show multiple payments for only one set of goods received from the exporter, increasing their procurement expenses.
Why do criminals engage in trade-based money laundering?
Lack of regulations
There are no standard regulations for trading transactions. Import and export of goods are regulated by the agreement between a buyer and seller and the respective countries’ regulations. No global regulator controls these transactions; the two parties entering the contract govern the trade terms.
A rise in the amount and volume of trade
Globalization has resulted in increased trade activities across the world. Countries engage in multiple import and export transactions with several countries. These transactions have increased in number and value over the years. It allows criminals to bypass commercial rules during these humongous trade transactions, avoiding the attention of the authorities.
Increase in free trade zones
Businesses are attracted to free trade zones for their ease of conducting business, as there are fewer regulatory constraints in these zones. The absence of rules is better than circumventing rules. The number of TBML transactions has also increased with a rise in free trade zones.
Use of open account payment method
Open account transactions are the ones where payment is due after a specified time of the occurrence of the trading activity, i.e., the goods are delivered to the party, and the payment is made after 30/90 days. This time gap minimizes the connection between the actual trade and the related payment. These transactions are subject to less oversight from financial institutions; hence, criminals increasingly use these methods.
How is trade-based money laundering conducted?
Understanding the standard techniques of conducting trade-based money laundering is essential to combat the same. The following are the most used TBML techniques:
Over-invoicing of goods
The exporter inflates the price of the goods in the invoice compared to their market value. In this case, exporters receive higher payments from the importer, allowing the importer to launder money and convert/transfer through import/export transactions.
Under-invoicing of goods
The exporter prepares the invoice for the goods at a price lower than the fair market value. Importers get goods at a lower value, resulting in the evasion of import duties.
Multi-invoicing
Exporters create multiple invoices for the same set of goods to be shipped. They can receive multiple payments for the same shipment, using different payment methods adding layers of complexity. Thus, launderers legitimize their illicit money through multiple invoicing.
Changing the quantity of goods
Launderers can also change the quantity or weight of goods being traded. They may report the quantity as more than the actual or less than the actual. In the case of over-quantity, they receive illicit money as payment and convert it to legitimate money. While in the case of under-quantity, they launder money by avoiding the payment of actual import duties.
Alternatively, they might report a specific quantity of goods while there is no shipment done. It is called phantom shipping or ghost shipping. Importers and exporters collaborate to create false invoices and other documentation without the actual shipping of goods. The illicit money is moved from the importer to the exporter without actual trade transactions.
Misrepresentation of goods
The exporters may represent the goods as expensive, though in reality, the goods are cheap. Thus, the invoice and customs documents show a high price while the actual value is less.
It is common in the gems and jewellery sector, where the invoice says raw diamonds and the shipment is of polished diamonds or artificial ones.
Non-documentary trade
For some trading transactions, there are no documents available for investigation. It is not that no documents are prepared for the transaction, but these are not accessible. The regulators have access to only the name, account number, and address of the buyer and seller.
In non-documentary trade transactions, regulators are unaware of the underlying flow of goods and trade activities. It is difficult for them to validate transactions. The absence of due diligence on the volume, type, quantity, and value of goods makes it easier for launderers to launder money.
What are the red flag indicators of trade-based money laundering?
The best option for individuals, companies, and countries is to observe the red flags of trading transactions. With the identification of suspicious transactions, you can investigate them further. Following is an illustrative list of TBML indicators:
- Differences in the descriptions of items to be traded in the invoice and the shipping bill.
- Differences in the market value of the items and the value mentioned on the invoice.
- Involvement of trading entities with registered addresses in residential buildings.
- The shipment size does not match the customer’s profile and regular business activities.
- Trading of an item from one jurisdiction to another or from one subsidiary to another, whose business activities are in no way related to each other or without logical economic reason.
- Involvement of trading entities with no physical presence or an online presence that does not align with its business activities.
- The type of goods traded does not align with the regular shipment of customers or the client’s profile and business activities.
- Trading transactions involving a third party with no relation to the transaction (either receiving cash payments or managing documents); offshore front companies or shell companies may be involved in such transactions.
- Trade deals involve complex trade routes that do not make geographical sense.
- Goods are exported from or imported into high-risk jurisdictions or countries with poor AML regulations.
- Missing trade documents or false documents.
- A sudden increase in trade transactions from or to a company that was dormant for a long time.
- Sudden high volumes or value of trade from an entirely new company.
What is the way out for businesses from trade-based money laundering?
Know Your Customer (KYC) and customer due diligence (CDD) are the best solutions for reducing trade-based money laundering. Businesses must implement policies to collect details on all their customers and transactions. Further, ongoing monitoring of the customer’s profile and the transaction is necessary to identify any unusual patterns. If they see any red flag, deeper scrutiny is essential to identify money laundering risks.
Using advanced technology systems or artificial intelligence is also an excellent solution to reduce money laundering risks. These systems can help businesses identify money laundering threats and send alerts. It allows the entities to report the TBML activities to the authorities promptly.
Countering Trade-Based Money Laundering
Trade-Based Money Laundering (TBML) is a widespread money laundering typology. This infographic elaborates on how Regulated Entities can effectively counter TBML by adopting risk-based countermeasures. Let us delve into each of these countermeasures in depth as follows:
Robust AML/CFT Policies and Procedures
Regulated Entities must ensure that they formulate and implement Anti Money Laundering and Counter Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) policies and procedures after considering TBML risk specific to the Regulated Entity by having at their core, a risk-based and risk-sensitive approach. A risk-sensitive AML/CFT policy and procedure should be devised after carefully weighing the TBML risk specific to the Regulated Entity.
Regulatory Oversight
Regulated Entities can successfully counter TBML risks by ensuring Compliance with applicable AML Laws and Regulations. The AML/CFT laws applicable to Regulated Entities in UAE are as follows:
- Federal Decree by Law No. (10) of 2025 Regarding Anti-Money Laundering, and Combating the Financing of Terrorism and Proliferation Financing.
- The Cabinet Resolution No. (134) of 2025 Concerning the Executive Regulations of Federal Decree-Law No. (10) of 2025 Concerning Combating Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing, and the Financing of the Proliferation of Weapons.
- Cabinet Resolution No. (74) of 2020 Regarding Terrorism Lists Regulation and Implementation of UN Security Council Resolutions on the Suppression and Combating of Terrorism, Terrorist Financing, Countering the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and its Financing and Relevant Resolutions.
- Cabinet Decision No. (109) of 2023 On Regulating the Beneficial Owner Procedures.
Transaction Monitoring
As TBML is a transaction-heavy money laundering technique, it makes rational business sense for Regulated Entities to invest in a Transaction Monitoring tool or software. A transaction monitoring tool helps Regulated Entities to identify suspicious transactions and transaction monitoring related red-flags. Regulated Entities must be mindful of ensuring that they impart adequate and training to staff for using transaction monitoring tools for identifying TBML red flags to make the most of it.
Information Sharing
Regulated Entities must define within their AML/CFT policies and procedures methods for uniform sharing of information across branch offices, holdings, and subsidiaries spread across the globe. Such information sharing protocols must take into consideration, the applicable Data Protection and Data Privacy laws applicable across the globe. This information sharing protocol plays an instrumental role in identifying and mitigating TBML as secure sharing of information is important in identifying common areas posing TBML risks.
International Cooperation
Ensuring Compliance with internationally accepted AML Standards, such as Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Recommendations, interpretation notes, and publications to combat TBML, helps Regulated Entities ensure that they keep pace with internationally accepted standards and norms which facilitates with ease of doing business across the world.
Training and Awareness
Regulated Entities must ensure that they define Role Specific AML Training and Awareness program for their personnel which shall be helpful in combating TBML risks. This training must focus on making the personnel aware of the TBML typologies such as TBML through invoice manipulation and TBML red-flags. Policies must also define the frequency and means of training delivery into the AML Policies and Procedures.
Leveraging Technology
Regulated Entities must delegate manual AML Compliance processes to unified AML software solutions such as follows:
Record-Keeping
Regulated Entities must ensure that they maintain records of their TBML countermeasures to ensure adequate regulatory compliance. Regulated Entities must be careful about duration for which AML records have to be maintained according to Supervisory Body they are governed by.
These tools and software help regulated entities counter TBML risks by saving time and resources consumed by manual AML compliance processes.
How AML UAE can help
Associating with AML consultants, like AML UAE, can help you understand the red flags better to identify suspicious transactions and take necessary actions to combat the same.
AML UAE also helps clients form an AML compliance department and conduct employee training. Our AML consultants aid in developing relevant AML policies, selecting appropriate AML software, and managing the reporting requirements. We ensure you comply with applicable AML regulations and stay safe from money laundering threats.
AML UAE helps you safeguard your business from money
laundering threats.
Get in touch to know the best preventive and corrective actions.
Share via :
About the Author
Pathik Shah
FCA, CAMS, CISA, CS, DISA (ICAI), FAFP (ICAI)
Pathik is an ACAMS-certified AML consultant specialising in governance, risk, and compliance for regulated entities in the UAE. He brings over 28 years of experience, with 1,000+ hours of AML training and 200+ advisory engagements across DNFBPs, VASPs, and FIs. He supports businesses in aligning with AML/CFT requirements from the CBUAE, DFSA, MoET, MoJ, VARA, CMA, FSRA, and FATF. Known for translating complex regulations into audit-ready procedures, Pathik enables operational clarity and compliance readiness.
Reach Out to Pathik